Видео

Very good. I have a doubt. I would love to hear your comment on it. In recent months, I have been reflecting on the apparent prevalence of certain predatory mega-journals, in particular MDPI's Sustainability, which stands out as the journal with the most publications on various topics, according to various tourism bibliometrics. However, this observation has led me to consider the need for further analysis. Specifically, it has caught my attention that when using the percentage of publications in relation to the specific research topic in percentage terms (number of articles on a topic divided by the total number of articles published), the magnitude of the contribution decreases drastically. To illustrate this point, let me present a hypothetical example: Journal A has published 10 articles on prospect theory in the last five years, but its total output is 600 articles. In comparison, Journal B has published 25 articles on prospect theory in the same period, but its total publication volume exceeds 49,000 articles. Some bibliometrics would say that Journal B is the one that publishes the most, however, it is just a matter of gaining by quantity. I gave the journals weights based on their percentages (Weight of journal = Percentage of Journal / Highest Percentage among journals) then I did the min-max normalisation (Normalised weight = (Weight of Journal−Min Weight) / (Max Weight−Min Weight)), Then I created a Weighted Metric with Normalisation (multiplying the normalised * their weight). The use of min-max normalisation in this one is correct? Do you think there is a better approach?

Something not mentions. Take that formula A = 2r+7 Instead of being given A, you are given that r is 4.5 instead of being given A, and let's be honest, usually you are measuring r and trying to find A When you sub in the 4.5 for the variable, you must group it with the exponent. A = 2r+7 becomes A = (2*4.5)+7 While not too important here, there are other math problems where if you don't group them like that, you will get the wrong answer when you start using orders of operations to solve.

What a fantastic video! Distilled an hour's worth of content into five minutes. Thanks a ton!

responsibile for own learning

The Altmetric Donut ( heavy shit )

Thanks 🤩

thank you very much!!

Great help, thanks a lot!

Simples, rápido e objetivo. Obg!

cool vid

very easy to understand

thank you for the simple method

thanks

Thank you so much. This helped me in physics

Thank you!

A2L

Not understood.... Still confused🙁

creey background music

Thank you so much, helpful, really great idea putting resources into RUclips.

my left ear enjoyed this video

thank you

How many are here for LAN😏

This is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks a lot.

How would you use the central difference method for the first and last frames?

Very inofrmative and good to get started with the basics endnote

Nice

Nice video. To the point

tnks for the example, but when you has x=4t and y=3t-2, how can i do that?

very good

thx but can u do it with square root

thx

Thank you very much for this video, it do helps me a lot. Before I was trying to book the Endnote seminar from the library several times, but it always fully booked for my rarely log on. Now I can watch it on my PC, lovely!

Best advice ever!!

I am doing the Access to Leeds module

Terrific

nice

time table link.... pleces

plz answer me and thx

∫⁴ |3x-6| dy.can I intergate this? ⁰

nyc method

So how do you fit homework and making notes without going into the 7 hours of studying

Not when you get excellent grades :) It will be worth it